Infrastructure Management Add-On
Infrastructure Security Oversight
Live infrastructure requires more than baseline hardening and access control. It requires ongoing review of system activity, sound judgment about what those signals mean, and engineers who can act when something is wrong.
This service extends Infrastructure Management with active review, investigation, and response for security-relevant activity across the infrastructure. The work is handled by the same engineers responsible for the systems themselves.
Discuss security coverageWhy teams add this layer of coverage
Organizations usually add this service for one or both of these reasons:
One is direct security concern. That may follow an incident, a near miss, a change in risk posture, or simply the realization that nobody should be informally carrying the real responsibility for infrastructure security.
The other is external pressure. Customer security questionnaires, cyber insurance requirements, audits, and framework-driven work such as SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI, or ISO 27001 quickly expose gaps in both system controls and confidence in how to answer for them.
This add-on is for environments that need more direct security review, stronger infrastructure-side proof, and more support under customer, insurer, or audit scrutiny.
What this adds to Infrastructure Management
Infrastructure Management already includes core security responsibilities. This add-on introduces a higher-engagement layer built around deeper visibility, more direct engineer review, regular security scanning, remediation support, and stronger infrastructure-side guidance.
It adds more eyes on the environment, more security-specific tooling, and more support for answering security and compliance questions with confidence.
That includes review of findings, coordination around audit and attestation needs, support for security questionnaires, and help translating infrastructure reality into accurate, supportable answers for customers, insurers, and internal stakeholders.
This does not replace GRC, legal, or application security functions. It strengthens the infrastructure side of the picture so controls are more visible, findings are more actionable, and infrastructure answers hold up better under review.
What this includes
This adds deeper security review, scanning, remediation support, and compliance-facing infrastructure guidance.
Reviewing security-relevant system activity
Relevant system events are made available, retained appropriately, and reviewed continuously as part of ongoing infrastructure work.
Investigating suspicious activity
Unexpected access patterns, system changes, and behavioral anomalies are investigated in the context of how the environment actually behaves under real load.
Responding to infrastructure-level security incidents
When a security issue affects the infrastructure layer, we contain it, remediate it, and restore system stability.
Scanning for vulnerabilities and fixing what matters
We perform regular vulnerability scans and review the results in context. Identified issues are remediated directly in a production-safe manner, with the customer informed throughout.
Watching for unexpected runtime behavior
We maintain runtime visibility into system activity across managed infrastructure so unexpected or unauthorized behavior can be detected as it happens.
Keeping logs and telemetry useful for investigation
We ensure logs and system telemetry are structured and retained for investigation and decision-making, not just collected.
Owning infrastructure security issues through resolution
When security issues arise within the infrastructure, we own the investigation and resolution, keep the work moving, and coordinate only where necessary.
Supporting security questionnaires with accurate infrastructure answers
We work directly with customers to interpret and respond to security questionnaires, including live guidance where needed. Responses are grounded in how the infrastructure is actually run, with clear answers aligned to real system behavior.
Security work grounded in system knowledge
Security work is only effective when it is grounded in an understanding of how systems behave under real conditions.
Because this service is delivered by the same engineers responsible for the infrastructure, security events are interpreted with system-level context, response actions are taken directly at the infrastructure layer, and changes are made with full awareness of risk and recovery paths.
For environments subject to regulatory or audit requirements, this level of involvement aligns with the technical controls typically expected under frameworks such as PCI, HIPAA, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 while staying focused on real system behavior rather than checklist compliance.
In practice, that means:
- Linux and FreeBSD production focus
- Direct engineer involvement in investigation and response
- Integrated with ongoing infrastructure operations
- Active review of security-relevant system activity
- Support for audit and security review processes
How this fits into Infrastructure Management
Infrastructure Security Oversight is delivered as part of ongoing Infrastructure Management. That structure ensures the team handling security work already knows the environment, can take action immediately at the infrastructure layer, and can keep that work aligned with how the systems actually run over time.
For environments with regulatory or audit requirements, this level of involvement brings infrastructure in line with what is typically expected.
Where internal security teams exist, we act as the infrastructure-side counterpart. Where they do not, this provides additional coverage without introducing a separate vendor layer.
Frequently asked questions
No. This is only available for systems under Infrastructure Management. It is designed as an extension of infrastructure responsibility, not a separate service.
We use a combination of log aggregation, security monitoring, vulnerability scanning, and runtime visibility tooling to support this work. The specific tools are less important than how they are used. Signals are continuously reviewed, investigated in context, and acted on by the same engineers responsible for the infrastructure.
No. We support those functions by handling infrastructure-level review and response, and by providing technical input where needed.
No. This service focuses on infrastructure and operating system layers. Application-level concerns remain with the application team.
We investigate, determine scope and impact, and take action at the infrastructure level. If other teams are involved, we coordinate and continue driving the issue toward resolution.
It is not required for all environments. For systems subject to regulatory or audit requirements, this level of involvement is typically expected.
We perform regular vulnerability scans and review the results in context. Remediation is handled as part of ongoing infrastructure work. Where changes require coordination, maintenance windows, or input from the customer, we plan that work accordingly and keep it production-safe.
Add security oversight to your infrastructure operations
For environments where security-relevant activity requires active interpretation and response, this extends infrastructure coverage to include it.
Discuss security coverage or view service levels →